Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64

On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:36:26PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I believe this patch is the correct fix. Can you confirm it works for you? 

Looks good, thanks.

		Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [uml-devel] Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64
    • From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kmalloc man page before 2.6.17
• Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]