On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:54:23AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 05:34, Jon Mason wrote:
> > swiotlb relies on the gart specific iommu_aperture variable to know if
> > we discovered a hardware IOMMU before swiotlb initialization. Introduce
> > iommu_detected to do the same thing, but in a HW IOMMU neutral manner,
> > in preparation for adding the Calgary HW IOMMU.
>
> I applied them all.
Fantastic!
> But I think you broke the aperture setup. iommu_setup really
> needs to be called early, otherwise aperture.c doesn't get
> the right parameters. I undid that change.
I'll take a look at that, but I did boot test these patches on my
opteron system and didn't notice anything wrong. Are the patches
available for me to look at on firstfloor?
> And please next time send against the latest tree. It required
> quite some tweaking to apply.
Sorry, I pulled a the latest mercurial tree this morning, but I guess
that one is stale (or became stale over the day).
> -Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
