> Would IRQs stay masked until the thread has finished running?
>
> I would say yes. But the system is basically broken if you have the
> same interrupt line that needs both to be threaded and NODELAY.
It's certainly less than and ideal situation .. If set an interrupt as
SA_NODELAY you'd think that it's suppose to be high priority , but then
you share it with something that's not high high priority which doesn't
make a lot of sense ..
However, the PCI bus doesn't (as far as I know) allow for interrupts to
easily be isolated .. So, with PCI, you may end up with potentially high
priority interrupts shared with some other interrupt .. So it is a
situation that could happen, maybe even often .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]