Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> I thought you were referring to shrink_dcache_parent(). At least, I
> was, and the hunk of diff that your comment followed after was from
> select_parent(). Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we're
> agreeing that it's doing the right thing in select_parent().
> The modified shrink_dcache_sb() doesn't do do any list moving at all,
> it simply frees all the dentries on the superblock in a single pass.....

I think I misread the code, I thought I was still at an older

> Cheers,
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> R&D Software Enginner
> SGI Australian Software Group


	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux