Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.

> I thought you were referring to shrink_dcache_parent(). At least, I
> was, and the hunk of diff that your comment followed after was from
> select_parent(). Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we're
> agreeing that it's doing the right thing in select_parent().
> 
> The modified shrink_dcache_sb() doesn't do do any list moving at all,
> it simply frees all the dentries on the superblock in a single pass.....

I think I misread the code, I thought I was still at an older
function.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> R&D Software Enginner
> SGI Australian Software Group

-- 

	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] [MMC] Fix premature use of md->disk
• Next by Date: New Linux Cross Reference (LXR) site
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.
• Next by thread: [PATCH] affs: possible null pointer dereference in affs_rename()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]