On 23 May 2006, at 22:23, Matt Ayres wrote:
Having looked at disassembly, the fault happens when accessing e->ip.invflags in ip_packet_match() inlined inside ipt_do_table(). e = private->entries[smp_processor_id()] + private->hook_entry[NF_IP_FORWARD] smp_processor_id() should be 0 (since the oops appears to occur on cpu0) and presumably all the ipt_entry structures are static once set up. Since this crash happens on a common path in ipt_do_table(), and since it happens only after the system has been up a while (I believe?), it rather looks as though something has either corrupted a pointer or unmapped memory from under iptables' feet.As the concerned user, what does this mean to me? It will only affect SMP systems? It is a bug in Xen or netfilter?
Probably a Xen bug, but if so then it's basically a memory corruption. It's weird it would hit the iptables rules every time though, and not be a more random crash. This might well need reproducing in a developer test-machine environment to stand a chance of tracking down.
-- Keir
I'd just like to understand what is going on.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- References:
- Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
- Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Keir Fraser <[email protected]>
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- From: Matt Ayres <[email protected]>
- Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1 of 10] ipath - fix spinlock recursion bug
- Next by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm3
- Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
- Index(es):