Martin Peschke wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Martin Peschke <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> My patch series is a proposal for a generic implementation of
> >> statistics.
> >
> > This uses debugfs for the user interface, but the
> > per-task-delay-accounting-*.patch series from Balbir creates an
> > extensible netlink-based system for passing instrumentation results back
> > to userspace.
> >
> > Can this code be converted to use those netlink interfaces, or is
> > Balbir's approach unsuitable, or hasn't it even been considered, or
> > what?
>
> Andrew,
>
> taskstats, Balbir'r approach, is too specific and doesn't work for me.
> It is by design limited to per-task data.
>
> My statistics code is not limited to per-task statistics, but allows
> exploiters to have data been accumulated and been shown for whatever
> entity they need to, may it be for tasks, for SCSI disks, per adapter, per
> queue, per interface, for a device driver, etc.
How does your work and Balbir's and CKRM relate to each other?
Is there not a way to abstract your works to provide a common statistics
infrastructure for all?
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
