On 5/19/06, Martin Peschke <[email protected]> wrote:
This patch adds a match_* derivate for 64 bit operands to the parser library.
Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/parser.h | 1 +
lib/parser.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff -Nurp a/lib/parser.c b/lib/parser.c
--- a/lib/parser.c 2006-03-20 06:53:29.000000000 +0100
+++ b/lib/parser.c 2006-05-19 16:01:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -140,6 +140,35 @@ static int match_number(substring_t *s,
}
/**
+ * match_s64: scan a number in the given base from a substring_t
+ * @s: substring to be scanned
+ * @result: resulting integer on success
+ * @base: base to use when converting string
+ *
+ * Description: Given a &substring_t and a base, attempts to parse the substring
+ * as a number in that base. On success, sets @result to the s64 represented
+ * by the string and returns 0. Returns either -ENOMEM or -EINVAL on failure.
+ */
+int match_s64(substring_t *s, s64 *result, int base)
+{
+ char *endp;
+ char *buf;
+ int ret;
+
+ buf = kmalloc(s->to - s->from + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ memcpy(buf, s->from, s->to - s->from);
+ buf[s->to - s->from] = '\0';
+ *result = simple_strtoll(buf, &endp, base);
+ ret = 0;
+ if (endp == buf)
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ kfree(buf);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
* match_int: - scan a decimal representation of an integer from a substring_t
* @s: substring_t to be scanned
* @result: resulting integer on success
@@ -218,3 +247,4 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(match_octal);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(match_hex);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(match_strcpy);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(match_strdup);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(match_s64);
diff -Nurp a/include/linux/parser.h b/include/linux/parser.h
--- a/include/linux/parser.h 2006-03-20 06:53:29.000000000 +0100
+++ b/include/linux/parser.h 2006-05-19 16:01:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -31,3 +31,4 @@ int match_octal(substring_t *, int *resu
int match_hex(substring_t *, int *result);
void match_strcpy(char *, substring_t *);
char *match_strdup(substring_t *);
+int match_s64(substring_t *, s64 *result, int);
Sorry for the delay in reviewing. I am just catching up with pending items.
I wonder if makes sense to fold this along with match_u64(). 90% of
their code is common. We can avoid text replication by folding the
code and the common code is easier to maintain.
Regards,
Balbir
Linux Technology Center,
India Software Labs,
Bangalore
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]