>> > Any idea why this wasn't done for bzip2?
>>
>> Yes, the bzip2 author I have been told was originally planning to do that,
>> but then thought it would be harder to deploy that way (because gzip is a
>> core utility, and people are nervous about making it larger.)
I'd say that concern is valid.
>It's a bit of a shame bzip2 even exists, really. It really would be better if
>there was one unified, pluggable archiver on UNIX (and portables).
Would You Like To Contribute(tm)? :)
Whenever a program is missing, someone is there to write it.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
