Re: netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure)

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:04:00AM +0530, Balbir Singh ([email protected]) wrote:
> Anybody else want to take a shot in comparing the two?

Netlink is always presented in the kernel, so no need to make
additional dependencies for special FS.
But number of netlink sockets is not that big, so use new one if you
create really generic mechanism, or consider using connector/gennetlink.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure
    • From: Martin Peschke <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure)
    • From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>
  • Re: netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure)
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)
• Next by Date: Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)
• Previous by thread: Re: netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure)
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]