Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > > is it really a big problem to add "vdso=0" to the long list of > requirements you need to run a 2.6 kernel on an old distribution (or to > disable CONFIG_VDSO)? FC1 wasnt even 2.6-ready, it used a 2.4 kernel! I assume that FC1-using people aren't the only ones who will be affected by this. We just don't know. Oh well. One way of finding out is to ship the thing ;) I seem to have lost the vdso=0 patch and the CONFIG_VDSO patch. Resend, please? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5 & lmsensors
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kmap tracking
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Gerd Hoffman's move-vsyscall-into-user-address-range patch
- Next by thread: ifIndex allocation
- Index(es):
 |