Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained?

On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> Be serious, oprofile is good working code, even if you have some
> personal problem with it.

Does the opinion of the former mantainer count for nothing? If nothing
else, it should remain experimental on arches like Alpha, where there's
a whole bunch of events that can't possibly work.

regards
john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained?
    • From: Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386 Don't conside oprofile EXPERIMENTAL anymore
    • From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
  • Is OPROFILE actively maintained?
    • From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained?
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [IDEA] Poor man's UPS
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Remove readv/writev methods and use aio_read/aio_write instead
• Previous by thread: Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained?
• Next by thread: Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]