> Can "noapic" or "nolapic" solve this ? Does it mean ( with these
> parameters ) that devices will start to use 8259 interrupt controller
> instead APIC ?
nolapic won't work on SMP (or rather forced UP mode)
You'll not see the messages anymore, but might get silent corruption.
Or it might work around it because it will make everything a bit slower.
>
> Is harmfull put "noapic" on "nolapic" to cmdline ?
If all devices can still be accessed noapic is just slower.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
