Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction

Pavel Machek <[email protected]> writes:

> Well, if pid #1 virtualization is only needed for pstree, we may want
> to fix pstree instead :-).

One thing that is not clear is if isolation by permission checks is any
easier to implement than isolation with a namespace.

Isolation at permission checks may actually be more expensive in terms
of execution time, and maintenance.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/9] namespaces: add nsproxy
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]