On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:57:10PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Why on earth would we want to remove a working feature ?
We don't. I personally don't want to see it go, I use it myself.
> Just because it isn't getting patched every release doesn't mean
> it's rotting, Oprofile is actually one of the few kernel features
> which I don't recall a single regression in since 2.6.0
It works for me, still others have claimed it's unmaintained and has
issues that have not been address.
> BROKEN is for stuff that doesn't compile, or is fundamentally flawed
> beyond repair at the current time (For example, needs infrastructure
> work to happen before it can work correctly).
Sure, based on my personal experience oprofile works fine, I'm just
putting an idea out there given comments from others.
> Oprofile fits neither of those categories.
So it should remain EXPERIMENTAL then in your view?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]