On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:38:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > Actually it is kinda throttled, but only on process name.
> > This patch just removes that stuff completely.
> > (Also removes a bunch of trailing whitespace)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c~ 2006-05-21 14:50:57.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2006-05-21 14:51:48.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -522,17 +522,9 @@ sys32_waitpid(compat_pid_t pid, unsigned
> > }
> >
> > int sys32_ni_syscall(int call)
> > -{
> > - struct task_struct *me = current;
> > - static char lastcomm[sizeof(me->comm)];
> > -
> > - if (strncmp(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm))) {
> > - printk(KERN_INFO "IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n",
> > - call, me->comm);
> > - strncpy(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm));
> > - }
> > - return -ENOSYS;
> > -}
> > +{
> > + return -ENOSYS;
> > +}
> >...
>
> Why can't we remove sys32_ni_syscall() and call sys_ni_syscall()
> instead if all we want to do is to return -ENOSYS?
We could, though it's a more invasive patch, which would probably sprinkle
extra includes/externs over multiple files, for no practical gain
over having this tiny function isolated to this file.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
