"Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Here are the numbers with the basic patchsets. But I guess I should
> do another round with adding 7 more void*'s to represent additional
> namespaces.
I'm a little slow coming up to speed on these benchmarks.
dbench and tbench are measured in megabytes per second correct?
kernbench is the number of seconds it takes to compile a kernel?
reaim is measured in jobs per minute?
So if I read this right the differences are currently in
the noise levels, from your testing.
> (intervals are for 95% CI, tests were each run 15 times)
>
> | with nsproxy | without nsproxy |
> kernbench | 68.90 +/- 0.21 | 69.06 +/- 0.22 |
> dbench | 386.0 +/- 26.6 | 388.4 +/- 21.0 |
> tbench | 391.6 +/- 8.00 | 389.4 +/- 10.95 |
>
> reaim with nsproxy
> 1 115600.000000 5512.441557
> 3 246985.712000 9375.780582
> 5 272309.092000 8029.833742
> 7 290020.000000 7288.367116
> 9 298591.580000 5557.531915
> 11 nan nan
> 13 nan nan
> 15 nan nan
>
> reaim without nsproxy
> 1 110160.000000 5728.697311
> 3 246985.712000 9375.780582
> 5 262204.197333 11138.510652
> 7 288660.000000 6880.898412
> 9 300631.580000 4351.926692
> 11 nan nan
> 13 nan nan
> 15 nan nan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
