Re: [patch] i386, vdso=[0|1] boot option and /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 02:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > * Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Well that patch took a machine from working to non-working.  Pretty serious
> > > > stuff.  We should get to the bottom of the problem so we can assess the
> > > > risk and impact, no?
> > > 
> > > Yes. And it would be good to have a way to turn it off - either 
> > > globally of by some per-process setup (eg off by default, but turn on 
> > > when doing some magic).
> > > 
> > > The per-process one would be the harder one, because it would require 
> > > the fixmap entry, but not globally. So I suspect the only practical 
> > > thing would be to have it be a kernel boot-time option.
> > 
> > below is a patch that adds the vdso=0 boot option from exec-shield and 
> > the /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled per-system sysctl.
> > 
> > Andrew, could you try this - do newly started processes work fine if you 
> > re-enable the vdso after booting with vdso=0?
> 
> vmm:/home/akpm# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled 
> vmm:/home/akpm# 
> vmm:/home/akpm> ls -l
> zsh: segmentation fault  ls -l

any chance to get a coredump ?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux