Re: Was this really supposed to go in?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:36:40PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Commit 2c171bf13423dc5293188cea7f6c2da1720926e2 in Linus' tree seems
> strange. It includes more changes than Pavel's original patch, but with
> the same commit message.

They shouldn't have gone in - they were a change I was working on a few
days ago which I left in the git tree uncommitted.  Applying Pavel's
patch then committed them.

> Also, I think the extra changes are broken as we then would have two
> parameters that have that contain the same information, yet the do not
> have the same ranges.

It's part of transitioning the data transfers over to taking the byte
size instead of the log2 byte size.

Well, I can't do anything about it now - I'm going away for a couple
of weeks from tomorrow morning.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux