Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction

On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 09:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Migration of currently-open sockets (for example) would require storing of
> a lot of state, wouldn't it?

In a word, yes. :)

I don't think the networking guys from either the OpenVZ project or IBM
were cc'd on this.  Alexey, Daniel, can you elaborate, or point us to
any existing code?

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Invalid module format?
• Next by Date: Re: write_out_data in JBD
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]