Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:41:45AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I think I see a third way of justifying a mainline merge.  We make an
> up-front decision that we will improve the existing chroot jail
> functionality in Linux and start making improvements.  Even if some of
> the improvements are quite small. 

FWIW, UML can use this stuff incrementally.  So, from my point of view,
it's not an all-or-nothing thing.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: Invalid module format?
• Next by Date: Re: Stealing ur megahurts (no, really)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]