On Thu, 18 May 2006 10:34:30 -0700, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I see two ways of justifying a mainline merge of things such as this
>a) We make an up-front decision that Linux _will_ have OS-virtualisation
> capability in the future
After using OpenVZ for a short time, I wonder how I ever managed
without it. For application development and testing, having a little
sandbox with only a few PIDs running makes it easier to debug things.
> and just start putting in place the pieces for that, even if some
> of them are not immediately useful. I suspect that'd be acceptable,
> although I worry that we'd get partway through and some issues would
> come up which are irreconcilable amongst the various groups.
>From a user's POV, I want it ASAP. As for conflicts, why not cross
that bridge when you come to it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
