Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:03 +0800, Zang Roy-r61911 wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2006年5月17日 21:28
To: Zang Roy-r61911
Cc: Paul Mackerras; linuxppc-dev list; [email protected]; Yang Xin-Xin-r48390
Subject: Re: [PATCH/2.6.17-rc4 10/10] bugs fix for marvell SATA on powerpc pl atform
Copying here the comments I already made so Jeff gets them...
@@ -1032,6 +1032,9 @@ static inline void mv_crqb_pack_cmd(u16
{
*cmdw = data | (addr << CRQB_CMD_ADDR_SHIFT) | CRQB_CMD_CS |
(last ? CRQB_CMD_LAST : 0);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
+ *cmdw = cpu_to_le16(*cmdw);
+#endif
}
Why an ifdef here ? The cpu_to_le16 should probably be unconditional.
And even if for some weird reason you wanted to ifdef it, why PPC ? and
what about other BE architectures ?
/**
@@ -1567,13 +1570,18 @@ static void mv5_read_preamp(struct mv_ho
static void mv5_enable_leds(struct mv_host_priv *hpriv, void __iomem
*mmio)
{
u32 tmp;
-
+#ifndef CONFIG_PPC
writel(0, mmio + MV_GPIO_PORT_CTL);
+#endif
You'll have to do better here too... I don't wee why when compiled on
PPC, this driver should "magically" not clear those bits... At the very
least, you should test the machine type if you want to do something
specific to your platform, but first, you'll have to convince Jeff why
this change has to be done in the first place and if there is a better
way to handle it.
Correct... it does seem some bugs were found, but #ifdef powerpc is
certainly out of the question. We want the driver to work without
ifdefs on all platforms.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
