Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support

>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Novell, Inc.
>> + *	Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
>> + *
>> + * A simple API for unwinding kernel stacks.  This is used for
>> + * debugging and error reporting purposes.  The kernel doesn't need
>> + * full-blown stack unwinding with all the bells and whistles, so there
>> + * is not much point in implementing the full Dwarf2 unwind API.
>
>Missing GPL?

I took include/asm-ia64/unwind.h's header as a template - is there anything wrong with that?

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
• Next by Date: Re: replacing X Window System !
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] reliable stack trace support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]