Darren,
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:30 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Following Ingo's example I have included the modified test case (please see
> the original mail for librt.h) that starts the trace before each sleep and
> disables it after we wake up. If we have missed a period, we print the
> trace.
>
Your test program fails (at least on my box) as the overhead of
starting and stopping the trace in the 5 ms period is just too high.
By moving the latency_trace_start() at the start of the thread
function and latency_trace_stop() at the end, everything runs fine.
I did not have any period missed even under heavy load.
Sébastien.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
