Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes

Matthew Frost <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This may sound like a dumb question, but aside from code bloat, what are 
>  the performance issues involved in running 64-bit resources on 32-bit 
>  systems?

Unmeasurably minor, I expect.

No sane software project would take on this (small) maintenance burden just
to save 50-60 kbytes.  We would though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
    • From: Matthew Frost <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
    • From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
    • From: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
    • From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
    • From: Matthew Frost <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Regression seen for patch "sched:dont decrease idle sleep avg"
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/03] Cpuset: might sleep checking zones allowed fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]