Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes

Matthew Frost <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This may sound like a dumb question, but aside from code bloat, what are 
>  the performance issues involved in running 64-bit resources on 32-bit 
>  systems?

Unmeasurably minor, I expect.

No sane software project would take on this (small) maintenance burden just
to save 50-60 kbytes.  We would though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
  - From: Matthew Frost <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
  - From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
  - From: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
  - From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
  - From: Matthew Frost <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Regression seen for patch "sched:dont decrease idle sleep avg"
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/03] Cpuset: might sleep checking zones allowed fix
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] kconfigurable resources core changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]