Re: replacing X Window System !

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

We dont need 2 kernels like today.
All "dangerous code" should be in kernel.
The kernel is even more privileged than the X server
so putting
dangerous code there is counterproductive. Security
comes about through
intelligent design decisions, compartmentalisation,
isolation of
security critical code segments and the like. If you
merely put shit in
a different bucket you still have a bad smell.
With "dangerous code" I meant : code which *could be
potentially dangerous* like accessing directly the
hardware etc.
That code should be only in the kernel.

It's your opinion only.

Stas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux