Re: [RFC PATCH 00/09] robust VM per_cpu variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 May 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Wed, 17 May 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > OK, now I'm just rambling. I don't know,  have any other ideas on making
> > this more robust?  Or is this all in vain, and I should spend my evenings
> > walking around this beautiful town of Karlsruhe ;)
>
> Well I'd like to see a comprehensive solution including a fix for the
> problems with allocper_cpu() allocations (allocper_cpu has to allocate
> memory for potential processors... which could be a lot on
> some types of systems and its allocated somewhere not on the nodes of the
> processor since they may not yet be online).

OK, now you're beyond what I'm working with ;)  No hot plug CPUs for me.
Well, at least not yet!

>
> Wish I could be back home in Germany to talk a walk with you. Are you
> coming to the OLS?

I'm just here on business. Will be back home in the States on Saturday.

Yep, I'll be at OLS.  Hopefully we can get a group together to do some
brainstorming.

Thanks,

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux