Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter

David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:26:03 +0200
> 
>>OK, updated patch attached. The TTL is now always kept up-to-date.
> 
> 
> Looks nice.
> 
> Is there any reasonable reason to allow ip_pkt_list_tot to ever be
> larger than say 255?  If we can accept that limit, we can shrink
> the recent_entry considerably by packing the index and nstamps
> into a single word next to ttl.


My primary goal was full compatibility, I have no idea about real-life
usage though. Maybe Stephen can answer this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
    • From: Stephen Frost <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
    • From: Stephen Frost <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
    • From: Stephen Frost <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
    • From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
• Next by Date: Re: [RFT] major libata update
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]