Re: [PATCH] Register sysfs file for hotpluged new node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 21:23 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> > +       /*
> > +        * register this node to sysfs.
> > +        * this is depends on topology. So each arch has its own.
> > +        */
> > +       if (new_pgdat){
> > +               ret = arch_register_node(nid);
> > +               BUG_ON(ret);
> > +       } 
> 
> Please don't do BUG_ON()s for things like this.  Memory hotplug _should_
> handle failures from top to bottom and not screw you over.  It isn't a
> crime or a bug to be out of memory.  

Basically, I would like to agree. 
But, there is no way to roll back from here now.
If online_node_map is set once, then new pgdat might be touched.
There is no way to disable them.

And I suppose it is not good thing that creating sysfs file of new node
before setting online_node_map. It means user interface is shown
before system initialization completion.

(In addition, remove_memory() is not yet....)

If return code of arch_register_node is ignored, 
cpu hotplug will work without new node's file.
When we tried cpu hotplug on it, it was cause of stack dump at last.

> Have you run this past the ppc maintainers?

Nope. I just tried cross compile.
I want powerpc box for test....


Thanks.

-- 
Yasunori Goto 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux