Re: [RFC] [Patch 7/8] statistics infrastructure - exploitation prerequisite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
Martin Peschke <[email protected]> wrote:
need sched_clock for latency statistics

sched_clock() probably isn't suitable for this application.  It's a
scheduler thing and has a number of accuracy problems.

But I thought we discussed this last time around?  Maybe not.

I have been too obsessed with the other issues to remember.

> Maybe you've considered sched_clock()'s drawbacks and you've decided
> they're all acceptable.

Admittedly, I didn't, but merely believed the comment above the function.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114657675408686&w=2
sheds some light.

I would be happy to exploit an API that may result from that discussion.
I would plead for exporting such an API to modules. I don't see how
to implement statistics for latencies, otherwise.

Any other hints on how to replace my sched_clock() calls are welcome.
(I want to measure elapsed times in units that are understandable to
users without hardware manuals and calculator, such as milliseconds.)

Martin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux