Tejun Heo wrote:
> Is this agreed upon? I tend to omit almost all unnecessary (by operator
> precedence) parenthesis, so in new EH and all other stuff, the "a && b &
> c" sort of lines are abundant. If this is something that's agreed upon,
> I can do a clean sweep over those.
More parens == easier to review. So
a && b & c
a && (b & c)
to clearly delineate the separate expressions to the human eye, and also
make it clear to the reader that the '&' is intended, and not a typo
that should have been '&&'.
Anytime you see a long string of 'if' conditions, and the operators
vary, add parents for readability.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]