On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:44, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:47:46PM +0000, Joachim Fritschi wrote:
> > After going over my patch again, i realized i missed the .cra_priority
> > and .cra_driver_name setting in the crypto api struct. Here is an updated
> > version of my patch:
> >
> > http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/twofish-i586-asm-2.6.1
> >7-2.diff
>
> Thanks for doing this Joachim. I like the result.
>
> But the duplicate key code is a bit too much. The fact that AES does
> it should only serve as a reminder for us to fix it, not to create even
> more duplication.
>
> So could you please move the key generation code into a separate file,
> say crypto/twofish-common.c which can then be shared by all twofish
> implementations?
Sure, i will resubmit the patches in a few days.
>
> BTW, please include the actual patches the next time you submit them
> along with Signed-off-by lines. You should consult the file
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches for detailed instructions.
Seems like i referred to the wrong documentation then. I read the faq on
kernel.org ( http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s4-1 ) and tried to
follow the instructions :/. Sorry about that.
Regards,
Joachim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
