Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL

On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:08:41AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>  >  See? tty was already dereferenced.
> 
> And besides, we wouldn't ever get to the BUG_ON() because even if the
> function did manage to get called it would then explode in the

Agreed - your analysis is right
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
    • From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: send(), sendmsg(), sendto() not thread-safe
• Next by Date: Re: [RFT] major libata update
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]