Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL

On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:08:41AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>  >  See? tty was already dereferenced.
> 
> And besides, we wouldn't ever get to the BUG_ON() because even if the
> function did manage to get called it would then explode in the

Agreed - your analysis is right
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
  - From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: send(), sendmsg(), sendto() not thread-safe
Next by Date: Re: [RFT] major libata update
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] moxa: remove pointless check of 'tty' argument vs NULL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]