Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 6/6] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives

On Monday, 15. May 2006 12:12, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I haven't looked at RT-Mutex but are more than the 2 bottom bits used
> for this? 

No. Only 2 bits.

> If not, they can be masked out before look-up. 

Yes, just do it that way, if it is possible.


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 0/6] Kernel memory leak detector
  - From: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 6/6] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
  - From: Ingo Oeser <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 6/6] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
  - From: "Catalin Marinas" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86 NUMA panic compile error
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm1
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 6/6] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 6/6] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]