Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Daniel Walker wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 03:04 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> >
> > Just to clarify, although fdtable_defer_list_init(int cpu) creates a timer
> > for each CPU but sets them to the same CPU.  The mod_timer in the changed
> > function is what is used to spread the timers out.
>
> Your right , it could migrate with my change only .. But I don't think
> that a problem .. It's probably better ..

My only concern is that this makes things less deterministic, but I'm
probably being paranoid here.

-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: GPL and NON GPL version modules
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
• Next by thread: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]