Re: [PATCH] ide_dma_speed() fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Llu, 2006-05-15 at 17:44 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>     That's what gcc thinks. The code is 100% correct -- it will never reach 
> the switch statement with mode > 0 (in which case ultra_mask isn't used) and 
> ultra_mask unitialized. I may add an explicit initializer in the declaration 
> if you like...

Please leave the warning, this was discussed recently in other threads
and hiding warnings is very dangerous.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux