> http://groups.google.co.nz/groups?selm=7i86ni%24b7n%241%40palladium.transmeta.com
Linus' reasoning is actually outdated - on most modern x86s it is not
slower than the expanded code sequence because it will generate the
same number of macro/u-ops. But it would be still extremly ugly to
implement, which is a good reason not to.
> And perhaps x86-64 is handled different because of the red zone (some
> memory below the stack-pointer that can be accessed legally)?
Yes, but it's only 128 bytes so it won't help for larger frames.
It will also work if you preextended the stack before, but i wouldn't
rely on it.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
