On Sunday 14 May 2006 08:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday 12 May 2006 12:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Please also remember that you are introducing complexity in other ways,
> > > with that swap prefetching code and so on. Any comparison in speed
> > > should include the time to fault back in pages that have been
> > > discarded.
> >
> > Well, swap prefetching is useful for other workloads, too; so it gets
> > developed/tested outside swsusp.
>
> Still my experience indicates that it doesn't play very nice with swsusp
> and unfortunately it hogs the I/O.
There is no swap prefetching code linked in any way to swsusp suspend or
resume on mainline or -mm. It was a preliminary experiment and Rafael lost
interest in it so I never bothered pursuing it.
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
