We should keep the value of old_leader->tasks.next in de_thread,
otherwise we can't do for_each_process/do_each_thread without
tasklist_lock held.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
--- MM/fs/exec.c~3_RCU 2006-05-14 22:14:42.000000000 +0400
+++ MM/fs/exec.c 2006-05-14 22:32:13.000000000 +0400
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct
attach_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PID, current->pid);
attach_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID, current->signal->pgrp);
attach_pid(current, PIDTYPE_SID, current->signal->session);
- list_add_tail_rcu(¤t->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
+ list_replace_rcu(&leader->tasks, ¤t->tasks);
current->group_leader = current;
leader->group_leader = current;
@@ -714,7 +714,6 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct
/* Reduce leader to a thread */
detach_pid(leader, PIDTYPE_PGID);
detach_pid(leader, PIDTYPE_SID);
- list_del_init(&leader->tasks);
current->exit_signal = SIGCHLD;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]