Re: [RFC PATCH 23/35] Increase x86 interrupt vector range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 13 May 2006, at 18:44, Chuck Ebbert wrote:

AFAIC this could go in anytime.  It's simple, self-contained and makes
sense even without Xen.

One minor nit: the IRQ value isn't negated, it's complemented.  The
comments need to be fixed.

If we really want it disambiguated then we should call it something like 'bitwise-negated' or 'ones-complemented'. 'Complemented' alone is worse than 'negated' imo, since negation is at least the usual name for the tilde operator in C while complementation is an ambiguous term unless you know the base/radix.

 -- Keir

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux