On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:11:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So at this stage, 2.6.18 still appears to be a good time to start pushing
> people toward cifs, and December looks like an appropriate time to mark
> smbfs as broken. Subject to, of course, feedback-from-the-field.
I'm surprised that other vendors are actually still shipping it[1].
(Not only that, some vendors have actually been sitting on smbfs
patches for well over a year).
Given that it's clearly abandoned, moving to cifs seems to be the
only sensible thing to do, and anything that can be done to ease
that transition should be done.
Dave
[1] Especially after the recent security problem where smbfs stayed
vulnerable for a week or so after CIFS got fixed. How many bad guys
thought "Hmm, wonder if smbfs has the same bug" in that week?
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
