On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:43:46PM -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:26:55PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Compiling at each step is better than not. But my main point is
> > that it is superfluously broken into multiple patches.
>
> This comment is from about a year ago, so it probably has fallen off
> the radar:
>
> At 2005-06-02 14:51:54, Greg K-H wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:32:19AM -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > > What sort of
> > > logical chunks would you consider to be appropriate? Separate patches
> > > for each file (inode.c, file.c, super.c, etc.), which represent sets
> > > of functions for each major VFS object?
> >
> > Yes.
Yes, but don't break the build along the way.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
