On Saturday 13 May 2006 20:29, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> a long post.
So, why do we insist on keeping legacy hardware around? I mean, serial and
parallel ports are basically dead, as are ps/2 ports (USB killed them all).
VGA basically died out when DVI came around. Traditional IA32 is now dying
out thanks to x86-64. The basic internals have been surplanted by APIC. We
have a power management API, ACPI, which was unheard of on x86 15 years ago.
IDE is dying out, being replaced with SATA. Old SCSI methods are being
replaced with Serial SCSI. I mean, I could basically go on for hours saying
that pretty much all legacy hardware and methods are being replaced or have
already been replaced.
Even the traditional IBM PC BIOS is being replaced, by various new firmware
logic methods (such as openfirmware on x86, or intel's one who's name I
forget.)
So, why do we continue keeping VGA around? Why isn't there a better method?
Benjamin's post basically describes a technology that has been hacked to hell
and back and has been around entirely too long, so why hasn't someone created
something new?
--
Patrick McFarland || www.AdAstraPerAspera.com
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids,
we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and
listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo,
Inc, 1989
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
