Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:21:11 -0400
Cc: lkml <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>, Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>, Florian Schmidt <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>      1 [softirq-timer/0]

What happens if you set the softirq-timer threads to 99?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart <[email protected]>

References:
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Florian Paul Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/14] remap_file_pages protection support
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 4/6] Add kmemleak support for i386
Previous by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Next by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux