Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data

On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:39 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Careful, rt21 has a bug slipped in that might have funny results on SMP
> machines:
> 
> +		if (!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
> +			set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
> 
> John (although he later fixed it) added a ; after the if.  But the fix is
> not yet in Ingo's patch.

I saw that go by, and fixed it before building.  Mine is a UP build
anyway.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Florian Paul Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 00/02] update to Document futex PI design
Previous by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Next by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]