Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file

(since I was an instigator here...)

Greg KH wrote:

No, I agree with your patch, as you are having to reference the ids from
2 different files.  So because of that, I feel it's ok to have those ids
in the pci_id.h file.

Agreed.

Yes, the wording in the documentation file should be cleaned up a bit to
state this a bit better...

Agreed.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
    • From: Brent Casavant <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
    • From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: USB 2.0 ehci failure with large amount of RAM (4GB) on x86_64
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]