On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:28:16PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > Ah, right - there was another uevent mess in fs/super.c. Sorry, got them > confused... and that FPOS _is_ back. Actually... What happens is that turd in fs/super.c (one that should not have been resurrected) triggers call of block_uevent(). Which uses ->driverfs_dev. Which is a bug. So IMO we should simply kill that animal _again_, and see if block_uevent() is actually need for anything on its own. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Erik Mouw <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] smbus unhiding kills thermal management
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
- Index(es):