Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree

Why drag around old worn out baggage in new kernels?

If we follow this logic, then.

"LKML == Wikipedia"

"Your contributions can be reverted and removed at any time by any editor."

So why contribute in the first place?

Leave smbfs. The author worked his butt off and contributed to Linuxwith some very useful technology,

and leave his name in contributors.

Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: John Kelly <[email protected]>
- Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: John Kelly <[email protected]>
- Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
Next by Date: Re: acpi4asus
Previous by thread: Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
Next by thread: Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]