Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree

John, on LKML it is expected to not strip CC lists and at least keep the
one you are responding to.

On Fri, 12 May 2006, Tom Rini wrote:

>
> Of course perhaps this will cause someone who does care about smbfs to
> setup up to the plate and maintain it.
>

I admit, I only communicate to that laptop about once a year.  But if need
be, I'll (shudder) try to maintain it.

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: John Kelly <[email protected]>
  • Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: John Kelly <[email protected]>
  • Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Tom Rini <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
• Previous by thread: Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by thread: Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]