On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 12 May 2006 12:24, you wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again,
> > > but -rc4 is out there, and this is the time to hunker down for 2.6.17.
> > >
> > > If you know of any regressions, please holler now, so that we don't miss
> > > them.
> >
> > I got assertion failures in the bcm43xx driver:
> >
> > bcm43xx: Chip ID 0x4318, rev 0x2
>
> That is expected an non-fatal.
Assertion failed sounds rather fatal to me.
> It is no regression.
It is, I didn't see it in 2.6.17-rc3.
> We are working on it, but there won't be any fix for 2.6.17, as
> very intrusive changes are needed to fix this.
If it's non-fatal, could you remove the assertion, or make it print
something that sounds less fatal?
Erik
--
+-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 --
| Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]